He made a clear distinction between the assholes and the non assholes, on both sides. If you don't get that, you can't be helped. Find something else to focus your hatred on, because you are dead wrong about the #FinePeopleHoax
-
-
Replying to @Twitt_Itches @ScottAdamsSays and
He said there were fine people on both sides. He then pointed to a group of people who didn’t exist (the quiet non-white supremacists who were at a loud white supremacist rally) as the ‘non-assholes’.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @J0EBL0W @Twitt_Itches and
City of Charlottesville debunks your point with an independent study they conducted that shows there were many different types of people who were not associated with the white supremacists or antifa. (prediction: more goalpost shifting incoming) https://www.huntonak.com/images/content/3/4/v2/34613/final-report-ada-compliant-ready.pdf …
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @OwlenRose @Twitt_Itches and
Pegs 26-31 describe the event. It involves Richard Spencer riling up a bunch of white supremacists that lead to a counter protest. What people were involved with Richard Spencer’s group who weren’t white supremacists?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @J0EBL0W @OwlenRose and
It's irrelevant. President Trump was clearly under the impression that there were people other than the tiki torch people, who he condemned, present. If he was wrong about that it doesn't mean he was calling the people he just condemned fine people. Use your head.
4 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Twitt_Itches @OwlenRose and
Why did he need to say there were fine people on both sides then? Why not just condemn white supremacy and move on? Also he made a HUGE deal in that statement about waiting to comment until he had all of the facts. So it is relevant.
5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @J0EBL0W @Twitt_Itches and
Because their were innocent people there who weren't associated with the two violent groups. The President represents all the people, including innocent bystanders.
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @OwlenRose @Twitt_Itches and
He said ‘both sides’. Innocent bystanders wouldn’t have been on either side. So saying very fine people on both sides, wouldn’t have been referring to bystanders.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @J0EBL0W @OwlenRose and
You're spiraling out now. You've already admitted you were wrong, you just don't know it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Twitt_Itches @OwlenRose and
So your argument is that Trump was referring to a non-existent group of people when he said there were very fine people on both sides? And that’s why I’m wrong?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
They are confirmed to exist. Spoke to two of them myself. But their existence is irrelevant to the point. The president assumed they existed and stated his assumption clearly.
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @J0EBL0W and
I always assumed that Trump was talking about the statue issue in general, not about the attendees of the event and those in the vicinity. And there are fine people on both sides of the event within the context that I assumed.
0 replies 0 retweets 3 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.