The point is not the same. Since I never uttered a thing about racism, you are wrong. I support the free speech you describe. I simply want you to identify them, share your research, and tell their stories. Thus far you are a disappointment and have nothing but empty slogans.
-
-
Replying to @Gallagher4NY @ScottAdamsSays and
The only possible way to interpret someone calling Lee, the general of a successful army, highly respected by his allies and his enemies, a “loser” - is the racist angle, as in he fought for the slave-holding south. There is no reasonable alternative.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @PersuasionRisng @ScottAdamsSays and
Robert E Lee commanded the *unsuccessful* side in the Civil War. The losers. "The Lost Cause is an interpretation of the American Civil War (1861–1865) that seeks to present the war, from the perspective of Confederates, in the best possible terms." https://www.encyclopediavirginia.org/lost_cause_the
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Gallagher4NY @ScottAdamsSays and
He beat several Union generals, whom Lincoln had to keep replacing. His skill wasn’t disputed during his lifetime, by allies or enemies. But only those with emotional clarity can separate the man’s military genius and other virtues from his siding with the slaveholding states.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @PersuasionRisng @ScottAdamsSays and
Leading an armed insurrection against the United States government is not honorable. Losing is what it is. If your "emotional clarity" doesn't accept those facts, the losing part included which contradicts military genius given the outcome & capitulation, I can't help you.pic.twitter.com/OZcgpvdnRK
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Gallagher4NY @PersuasionRisng and
Allow me to help, Michael. Lee was rehabilitated by Congress, including the leading Democrat presidential candidate: In 1975 the Senate, which included freshman Democratic Delaware Sen. Joe Biden, unanimously approved the reinstatement of General Robert E. Lee’s US citizenship.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @tarfornost @PersuasionRisng and
1. I don't care. 2. Literally 110 years after the end of the Civil War 3. Don't vote for Joe then 1/x
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Gallagher4NY @tarfornost and
What do
@POTUS words mean? Who are the people he is talking about? Put them on TV & tell their stories. When these fine people are mentioned I have no idea who they are. I should know them, too. CNN is in the business. Fox friendly. Where are they@ScottAdamsSays? Who are they?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Gallagher4NY @tarfornost and
The networks have avoided this story. I hear they all believed the hoax themselves.
3 replies 1 retweet 9 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @tarfornost and
You’ve got bupkis. “Debunked” my tuchus. Sure, the networks have avoided it. Sure, Scott. A hoax. So far you’ve presented two people who don’t want to be identified and I’m called a doxxer for advocating they speak publicly, these free speechers.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Somehow you drifted from the main point, which is what Trump assumed about the attendees. He stated his assumption and spoke to it. Worst case scenario, he was wrong about his assumption. I confirmed he was not wrong by speaking to attendees. But that is not relevant.
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @tarfornost and
Michael Gallagher Retweeted
Come on Scott. You’ve done the research. Share with the rest of us. https://twitter.com/scottadamssays/status/1130178266092859392?s=21 …
Michael Gallagher added,
This Tweet is unavailable.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.