Don’t assume that any of the free speech supporters actually matched with the Nazis, because they didn’t. They did their own thing at the event, because they showed up for their own reasons.
-
-
Replying to @PersuasionRisng @ScottAdamsSays and
Who are they? These free speech supporters would seemingly want to exercise that speech and identify themselves and be interviewed. I feel like I should know these fine people but all I keep hearing is bupkis.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Sunset_USA @PersuasionRisng and
Feel free to provide an answer. I am not the only one who would appreciate learning about these fine defenders of free speech who were legally, quietly protesting with their permit but not with the Nazis.
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Gallagher4NY @Sunset_USA and
"I am not the only one who would appreciate learning about these fine defenders of free speech" Certainly you & others would like to doxx these people and destroy their lives and the lives of their friends and family. Ask the Covington kids what your motives are.
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @tarfornost @Sunset_USA and
So they are free speech advocates defending history when it comes to statues of dead losers and a Lost Cause but not when it comes to their own reputations. Seems perfectly reasonable. I just want to know who they are. So far I’ve got 3 plus sone others from
@ScottAdamsSays1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Gallagher4NY @tarfornost and
Let's see how many times I can say, "supporting free speech" and you can change that into "defending dead loser racists" so you have something to say after being humiliated for your wrongness in public.
3 replies 6 retweets 37 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @tarfornost and
I never said racists, btw. Dead losers (as in the Confederate States of America, which lost) and a Lost Cause, which is a common term of reference for the Confederacy.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Gallagher4NY @tarfornost and
The point is the same. You need to change "free speech" to something unrelated to criticize it. I realize it is hard to believe people support speech they do not personally agree with, but remember the ACLU once did the same. Now only happens on the right.
4 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @tarfornost and
What do you mean by that last remark. The
@ACLU is still hard at work defending free speech, including supporters and defenders of@POTUS (i.e.,@TPUSA) but your narrative appears to be contrived over something else. https://www.aclu.org/blog/free-speech/student-speech-and-privacy/when-colleges-confine-free-speech-zone-it-isnt-free …2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
They are no longer absolutists on speech.
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @tarfornost and
Based on what? "The problem is, 'Free Expression Areas' are not a thing under the Constitution — all public spaces in America are free-expression areas." https://www.aclu.org/blog/free-speech/student-speech-and-privacy/when-colleges-confine-free-speech-zone-it-isnt-free …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Gallagher4NY @tarfornost and
You won't see them defend Infowars, for example.
4 replies 0 retweets 3 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.