The claim was never that the world would end in 12 years, but that in 12 years we would pass a point of no return if we can't cut emissions by half or some nonsense. Your claim is she was being poorly hyperbolic, she wasn't. She was citing the UN study that says the same, 12 yrs
-
-
Except the people that are triggered into cognitive dissonance by the mention of nuclear power. Because there's an alarming large minority that is very vocal against nuclear
-
It's beyond that. They're worse than religious fanatics, and their tentacles extend into the Federal bureaucracies.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I wrote a paper in college in 1989 about nuclear saving the planet!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You're going to have to address the mindless malevolence of the Greens. I know a case where the Greens forced Rio Tinto Corp to abort a 25-mile wilderness road, making them drive 65 miles one way through a city in order to make EVERYONE suffer for the sin of mining copper.
-
These people are beyond mere "religious fanatics". In their opinion, they've killed "dangerous" nuclear, and they'll go ISIS if someone tries to resurrect the planet-saving technology.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.