This is a technique of the GOP, to take dry humor + sarcasm literally and “fact check” it. Like the “world ending in 12 years” thing, you’d have to have the social intelligence of a sea sponge to think it’s literal. But the GOP is basically Dwight from The Office so who knows.https://twitter.com/MaxKennerly/status/1127600111952044032 …
-
-
Replying to @AOC
Hey
@ScottAdamsSays, I know you don't think gaslighting is a thing, but this is the closest I've seen to gaslighting one's *own supporters* (I'm assuming here that sea sponges would be on the "low" range of social intelligence)17 replies 21 retweets 488 likes -
It seemed obvious to me at the time that it was not intended to be a literal.
208 replies 6 retweets 266 likes -
I’ll explain by Periscope today.
11 replies 1 retweet 51 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @EcoSenseNow and
She believed it was 12 years. Her source was that UN IPCC release that said if we don’t create a single global social state immediately than in 12 yrs climate change would destroy the world as we know it. (Basically)
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @jdeclue @EcoSenseNow and
Her source is something that says nothing like that?
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @EcoSenseNow and
I read it, and now I have to go find it. I thought the UN IPCC report had the 12 years in it and that is why so many libs took it seriously. The UN IPCC doesn’t believe it, total persuasion. I don’t know if she believed them. But her followers did. Im off to find that paper.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
You didn't read that the world would end in 12 years in any UN IPCC document.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.