That’s it. And even Crowdstrike backed off their definitive assessment it was Russia.
-
-
-
Re: the Crowdstrike assessment “...some cybersecurity experts have questioned its evidence.” <snip> “The original CrowdStrike report was dated Dec. 22, 2016, and the updated report was dated March 23, 2017.” https://www.voanews.com/a/cyber-firm-rewrites-part-disputed-russian-hacking-report/3781411.html …
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I want to hear more. Seems obvious to me too, but what makes you so sure?
- Show replies
-
-
-
Amazing to know they outsourced to existing data. DNC would not allow them access?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well they certainly didn't base it on the VIPS report.... https://www.thenation.com/article/a-new-report-raises-big-questions-about-last-years-dnc-hack/ …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's when I realized Mueller report is just prosecution's best case with no rebuttal. The fact they took Crowdstrike's word for it was quite a tell!
-
And Mueller never interviewed Julian Assange, who was willing to talk. In short, Mueller had the narrative he liked, and didn’t want to mess it up with new facts.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.