Assume people make false public accusations about you. Many observers will think less of you if they believe, but no legal action is threatened. How important is it to publicly respond with denials & rebuttals, & how does that depend on the status of the accuser?
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @robinhanson
Don't rebut at all, under most circumstances. Ride out the news cycle. PR 101.
5 replies 0 retweets 33 likes -
Replying to @primalpoly @robinhanson
Depends if the accusation will leave a mark. If trivial, ignore. If it is damaging beyond just your ego, unleash fire & fury until your rebuttal matches the accusation in search results. Even if punching down.
2 replies 4 retweets 45 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @robinhanson
In principle, yes. But I've never seen that work if the accusation is about political incorrectness. It's simply impossible to get the rebuttal repeated by enough people to counter-act the initial slander, given the ideological bias in social media.
1 reply 0 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @primalpoly @robinhanson
I’m doing it with the Fine People Hoax. But only a few independent minds are ever in play.
2 replies 1 retweet 17 likes -
You should do it with the 10 other major media lies about Trump too. - Muslim registry - Immigrants are animals - They're / their rapists - Mocking disabled reporter etc
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jonatanpallesen @ScottAdamsSays and
What’s your view of the Kovaleski story?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Here’s proof he uses that gesture for others, including Ted Cruz: https://bit.ly/20JtPms
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.