I'm providing @ScottAdamsSays with lots of valuable information about climate. Unfortunate that he isn't taking advantage of it.
-
-
Impact, maybe not.. Influence, how can it not?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Michael Mann says that skeptics are funded by the Koch Brothers... in other words a conspiracy. Will you ever apply the same rules to alarmists that you do to skeptics?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
You said that I lost "all credibility" because you disagreed with my observations about intent. Mann believes that Republicans intend to attack America.
-
Boom (again).
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Politics? Is it just me or did he poorly assess the data before him and incorrectly extrapolate from it, a wide ranging conspiracy?? Seems relevant.
-
Michael Mann seems to have a habit of poorly assessing the data before him and incorrectly extrapolating from it, whether it's national politics, or the politics of climate change. & Adams has a bad habit of defending him, whether over "Hiding The Decline" or hating Republicans.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
How about a different hypothesis: Being shown (by Goddard) to be a "Political Scientist" might perhaps affect (negatively) his performance in field that is highly charged, politically.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If Mann was confident in his position, he would have tried to persuade you rather than insulting and blocking you. His science is every bit as distorted as his politics.
-
Mann is unable to debate. He has no facts.
#ClimateHoax
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.