We had a whistleblower.... the guy who leaked the Climategate emails in 2009. He remains anonymous because the ultra-vicious climate mafia would destroy him.https://twitter.com/ScottAdamsSays/status/1120788428113596418 …
-
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @JunkScience
No data is "out of context", it all must be considered in total including what the emails showed.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @KevinAHarperVO @JunkScience
In context, colleagues were speaking casually to each other because they all understand the real meaning. Out of context, in public, the emails are misleading, looking like a conspiracy. Same as nearly every headline story today -- shit taken to the wrong context.
5 replies 1 retweet 12 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @KevinAHarperVO
Here is the full story behind the most infamous Climategate email. From the old, now-archived JunkScience web site... http://junksciencearchive.com/Hide_the_decline.html …pic.twitter.com/zZdXMhx5oh
2 replies 4 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @JunkScience @KevinAHarperVO
For context, I don't put much credibility in temperature reconstructions prior to modern instruments. So it all looks dodgy to me, but the point is that intent to defraud is very much not in evidence in the emails. Intent to "explain" or understand is obvious.
9 replies 0 retweets 9 likes -
Intent to mislead and intent to “hide” is evident in the climategate emails. They literally conspired to hide data from FOIA requests.
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
You imagine that. It isn't in evidence. It's a reading comprehension problem. You assume the wrong context for the emails. The words "trick" and "hide" have innocent meanings in the original context.
9 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Incorrect. I only object to the bad criticisms, not the good ones.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.