Mann intentionally omitted inconvenient, if not hypothesis-killing data... so "trick" and "hide" therefore have "innocent" meanings? Come on...https://twitter.com/ScottAdamsSays/status/1121043136573132801 …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Yes! Please I want to hear this
@ScottAdamsSays@JunkScience
End of conversation
-
-
-
After-the-fact explanations that don't wash. Mann & others went to great effort to delete inconvenient data and resisted FOIA requests. They hid /deleted data, source code and methods. You really should communicate with Steve McIntyre if you want to understand.
@ClimateAudit -
These types of accusations "he hid" etc. all fall apart under scrutiny. I'm exhausted from chasing ghosts. It always comes down to someone misreading an email or disagreeing with some data choices.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
What happened to you having Tony Heller and an alarmist on to debate?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Hide the decline" was not an innocent trick. Starting charts at 0 degrees anomaly is not an innocent trick. We have known zeros. Use them. 0 C I can recreate in my house. 0K is harder, but is a much better place to start charts. Starting charts at 0 C Anomaly confuses maker.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.