The Climategate emails validate the hokey stick conspiracy, efforts to silence skeptics, media complicity & many other fun facts to know and tell... e.g., the arbitrary origin of the 2C tipping point. All detailed at the time. Which email would you like to see and discuss?https://twitter.com/ScottAdamsSays/status/1121028731131162624 …
The question is clear. Cognitive blindness is preventing you from understanding it because it would annihilate your worldview. That's why you changed the topic, to find a safe space.
-
-
Ok, sure. Clarify "the most obvious interpretation of the facts in evidence" for me, in regards to emails or the actual data and measurements? I'm not arguing that they didn't believe in climate change I'm saying that the data doesn't support them even though they wanted it to.
-
I don't have an opinion on the science. I am not qualified to judge it. (I am very qualified to read an email and understand its meaning in context.)
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
However, even with normal words, there are different interpretations and one is left with believe their explanation or don't. The meaning to me was obvious as well.