Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
ScottAdamsSays's profile
Scott Adams
Scott Adams
Scott Adams
Verified account
@ScottAdamsSays

Tweets

Scott AdamsVerified account

@ScottAdamsSays

My Micro Lesson (2-4 min. videos) on being more happier and more effective in life are on Locals: http://bit.ly/2Ygv2tf 

Pleasanton CA
youtube.com/c/realCoffeeWi…
Joined October 2014

Tweets

  • © 2021 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Steve Milloy‏Verified account @JunkScience 23 Apr 2019

      Steve Milloy Retweeted Scott Adams

      We had a whistleblower.... the guy who leaked the Climategate emails in 2009. He remains anonymous because the ultra-vicious climate mafia would destroy him.https://twitter.com/ScottAdamsSays/status/1120788428113596418 …

      Steve Milloy added,

      Scott AdamsVerified account @ScottAdamsSays
      Replying to @Tony__Heller @SteveSGoddard @greg_kemper
      Fame. Money. Integrity. Save the planet. Same as any whistleblower.
      5 replies 28 retweets 113 likes
    2. Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays 24 Apr 2019
      Replying to @JunkScience

      The emails are out-of-context nothings.

      17 replies 0 retweets 10 likes
    3. KAH‏ @KevinAHarperVO 24 Apr 2019
      Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @JunkScience

      No data is "out of context", it all must be considered in total including what the emails showed.

      1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
    4. Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays 24 Apr 2019
      Replying to @KevinAHarperVO @JunkScience

      In context, colleagues were speaking casually to each other because they all understand the real meaning. Out of context, in public, the emails are misleading, looking like a conspiracy. Same as nearly every headline story today -- shit taken to the wrong context.

      5 replies 1 retweet 12 likes
    5. Steve Milloy‏Verified account @JunkScience 24 Apr 2019
      Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @KevinAHarperVO

      Here is the full story behind the most infamous Climategate email. From the old, now-archived JunkScience web site... http://junksciencearchive.com/Hide_the_decline.html …pic.twitter.com/zZdXMhx5oh

      2 replies 4 retweets 13 likes
    6. Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays 24 Apr 2019
      Replying to @JunkScience @KevinAHarperVO

      For context, I don't put much credibility in temperature reconstructions prior to modern instruments. So it all looks dodgy to me, but the point is that intent to defraud is very much not in evidence in the emails. Intent to "explain" or understand is obvious.

      9 replies 0 retweets 9 likes
    7. DocMinarchist-Healthcare Is Not a Right‏ @3GHtweets 24 Apr 2019
      Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @JunkScience @KevinAHarperVO

      There was an intent to rewrite climate history which began with MBH98. It was more than bad / dodgy science. It was a fraud. Thanks to the efforts of @ClimateAudit it failed, and Mann was caught out.

      1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes
      Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays 24 Apr 2019
      Replying to @3GHtweets @JunkScience and

      That's mind reading. The facts in evidence suggest they were believers in climate change peril and wanted to present the strongest case for it.

      6:17 AM - 24 Apr 2019
      • 1 Retweet
      • 2 Likes
      • Bob Graeber Crow / Edogawa Rambo
      4 replies 1 retweet 2 likes
        1. New conversation
        2. KAH‏ @KevinAHarperVO 24 Apr 2019
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @3GHtweets and

          There is a thing called "Research Bias" and it happens all the time.

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        3. Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays 24 Apr 2019
          Replying to @KevinAHarperVO @3GHtweets and

          Exactly. That is common, whereas global conspiracy is somewhat less likely.

          2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        4. Show replies
        1. New conversation
        2. Stephen McIntyre‏ @ClimateAudit 25 Apr 2019
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @3GHtweets and

          1/ Yes, they "wanted to present the strongest case for it". That is valid in "persuasion", but scientists are ethically required to disclose adverse data and results. Concealment of adverse results is the issue. MBH98 claimed statistical "skill", but concealed very insignificant

          4 replies 8 retweets 28 likes
        3. Stephen McIntyre‏ @ClimateAudit 25 Apr 2019
          Replying to @ClimateAudit @ScottAdamsSays and

          2/ verification r2 results for earlier steps, which, when discovered, undermined claims of statistical skill. To make it much more difficult to identify failed verification r2 results, Mann refused to provide the results for individual steps (from which verification r2 could

          2 replies 0 retweets 14 likes
        4. Show replies
        1. This Tweet is unavailable.
        2. Helen o'D‏ @boggywood 25 Apr 2019

          Although people keep trying.I think of it as I think of other things in the science field - such as new drug testng for, example -Alzheimer's . I & my team are positive about the benefits of the new drug.'It will change everything' & the sooner it gets out the better . . except

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        3. Show replies
        1. Reinhard Kuhn‏ @kuhn_reinhard 25 Apr 2019
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @3GHtweets and

          They aren't salesmen They aren't politicians They aren't preachers They are (supposed to be) scientists, which by definition should be quite the opposite of "believers" If they don't strictly stick to the facts, they fail

          0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. Terry Koch‏ @tkoch_a 25 Apr 2019
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @3GHtweets and

          Hey Scott - if they were scientists who were believers in the efficacy of a new drug and wanted to present the strongest case for it, so hid adverse effects would you give them a pass too? Lest you say that's a strawman, their policies affect everyone, not just those with the Rx.

          0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2021 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info