The Climategate emails validate the hokey stick conspiracy, efforts to silence skeptics, media complicity & many other fun facts to know and tell... e.g., the arbitrary origin of the 2C tipping point. All detailed at the time. Which email would you like to see and discuss?https://twitter.com/ScottAdamsSays/status/1121028731131162624 …
-
-
Ppl who thoughts this was the smoking gun of a conspiracy are delusional, granted, but this does feel like a classic straw man - adress the over the top critics so that you don’t have to adress the serious ones.
-
The whole story was of telling a story rather than assessing datas. Some were ignored, the main criticism being about ignoring the medieval warms and solid evidence of it in Greenland. Balanced, smart scientist Judith Curry dropped a career over this bc how damaging to science.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
1. The data was in fact manipulated which still proves they intended to mislead, and 2. the emails just confirmed what we already knew.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hide the decline represents a whole scandal. It’s not the email itself that is the scandal. Mann betrayed science to make it look like temps were low until now. He used bogus statistics and misleading plots. And he got caught!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes, your opinion, but what do you base that opinion on? Is it simply that you believe their explanation post fact of those emails? That's fine but the data still doesn't stand up.
-
Incorrect. I based my opinion on my original reading of the emails (when I was biased to think they were a smoking gun). They didn't look that way to me. The meaning was always obvious to me, and later confirmed by the participants.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
When the records show cooling they make catastrophic scholarly errors like turning the data that shows cooling upside down and then claim it demonstrates warming. Where exactly was Scott Adams in the 00s if he was analysing climate data back then?https://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/06/22/manns-inverted-tiljander-data-survives-another-round-of-peer-review/ …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
No. You can interpret it as meaning humans are some part of the climate change.
End of conversation
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Scott Adams, I'm wondering if what you mean by climategate emails, namely the "hide the decline" and "trick" emails, is only a very small subset of all the climategate emails. I think maybe this is a much bigger issue than you realize.
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.