We had a whistleblower.... the guy who leaked the Climategate emails in 2009. He remains anonymous because the ultra-vicious climate mafia would destroy him.https://twitter.com/ScottAdamsSays/status/1120788428113596418 …
-
-
It was certainly not "nothing" when Charlie Manson declared himself an Al Gore disciple, though, was it?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Learning from you, I understand I could be brainwashed w/this issue-Is it just cognitive bias though?Or the reputation of lying by this side-Specifically the “science is settled” mantra. disappointed you haven’t dealt w/ that persuasion success/fail-Its at the heart of the matter
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No data is "out of context", it all must be considered in total including what the emails showed.
-
In context, colleagues were speaking casually to each other because they all understand the real meaning. Out of context, in public, the emails are misleading, looking like a conspiracy. Same as nearly every headline story today -- shit taken to the wrong context.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
You mean the massive confirmation bias? Yes, I've noticed. That's the problem.
- Show replies
-
-
-
It wasn’t just the emails, it was the inside peek at the previously black-boxed source code that was jaw droppingly damning.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ok, Mr. Persuasion Expert (Which is nothing but rhetoric training - taught 2000+ years ago to every up and coming young man), explain to me why in the last 10-15 years, when all the climate change dire predictions actually didn't happen, has the hype campaign gone up 1000%?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Holy shit Scott, dead wrong. You saying the emails are out-of-context nothings is like tds people saying Trump called Nazis fine people. Go ahead put some of the emails in the correct context that makes them "nothing". I'll wait. https://youtu.be/b-uzNBtdYOo
-
No, in both cases it's people seeing things that aren't there and in both cases Scott is consistently on the side that does not see it - because it's not there. The email context has been duly addressed in some of Scott's Periscopes BTW.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.