Thousands of scientists across the world are all "in on it"? If you hypothesized they were wrong or suffering from confirmation bias, I could take it seriously. But when you go full-tin-hat, everything else you say turns to dust.
-
-
But the money is not made in the margins. It’s much better to be with the herd. Keynote addresses at conferences etc. You have personal knowledge of this from 2015 forward, so I don’t need to convince you.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The whistle blower would be censored by the media. The story would never be heard by the public. The individual would be accused of selling out to big oil, dementia, and mental illness. They would lose their job and career, just like every other climate whistle blower.
-
Name one whistleblower on the temperature data.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
It would be just as succesful as coming out as gay for a professional football player ('soccer') of decent fame. It strangely hasn't happened yet... must be a conspiracy...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hi Scott You are probably all over this, but The Peter Ridd vs James Cook University case is a prime case of the lengths a person has to go to in order to get justice when the Climateers dont like what your scientific research uncovers
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.