That's because you lost all credibility by imagining nefarious intentions where there is nothing like that in evidence. The Climategate emails that you believe prove intention are where you lost me entirely.
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
Of course Scott. They are "accidentally" using 50% fake data to turn cooling into warming. No nefarious intent. https://realclimatescience.com/2019/04/understanding-noaa-us-temperature-fraud-2/ …pic.twitter.com/OA3CBeRPUp
This media may contain sensitive material. Learn more
4 replies 18 retweets 106 likes -
Replying to @Tony__Heller @SteveSGoddard
Thousands of scientists across the world are all "in on it"? If you hypothesized they were wrong or suffering from confirmation bias, I could take it seriously. But when you go full-tin-hat, everything else you say turns to dust.
32 replies 0 retweets 24 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
Straw man argument. The temperature record is handled by a small handful of people, perhaps a dozen. Would you also argue that "thousands of FBI agents" couldn't have conspired against President Trump? All it takes is for a few key people to misbehave.
8 replies 17 retweets 153 likes -
Replying to @Tony__Heller @SteveSGoddard
Actually, I make that same argument in my upcoming book as a reason to not trust peer review to catch temperature data errors. But it would still be unlikely for a dozen people (per proxy) in different parts of the globe to all be in on this alleged con.
22 replies 0 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @SteveSGoddard
Scott, it was shown just yesterday that four people could magically come up with the same “Easter worshipers” phrase out of thin air. Obviously they coordinated. Is it so much of a stretch for 12 people in the same profession to coordinate as well?
3 replies 7 retweets 41 likes -
Replying to @greg_kemper @SteveSGoddard
We have lots of history of scientists being wrong at the same time (hole in the ozone, nutrition, etc.). A global conspiracy with this much attention on it is POSSIBLE but highly unlikely. You'd have at least one whistleblower by now. It has been a long time.
15 replies 2 retweets 8 likes -
President Illegitimus Felis Domesticus Retweeted
Scott here is another example. Scientist in Australia Pete Ridd sacked by University for telling the truth. https://twitter.com/jamesdelingpole/status/1118779944925048832?s=21 …
President Illegitimus Felis Domesticus added,
This Tweet is unavailable.3 replies 10 retweets 21 likes -
The topic is whistleblowers who were directly involved in temperature measurements. Still zero.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Example of whistleblower in Australia re temperatures: http://joannenova.com.au/2017/08/scandal-australian-bureau-of-meteorology-caught-erasing-cold-temperatures/ …
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes
Disagreeing with a quality control process is not the same as discovering a secret conspiracy theory.
-
-
You asked for an example of whistleblowers directly involved in temperature measurements.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Leigh252425 @ScottAdamsSays and
He thinks we can’t see that he’s moving the goalposts....
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.