That's because you lost all credibility by imagining nefarious intentions where there is nothing like that in evidence. The Climategate emails that you believe prove intention are where you lost me entirely.
-
-
It doesnt work that way Scott.....
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But look at disincentives here: No fame (likely public bashing), LOSS of money/job/status, and only saving a colossal waste of money & resources. The other side is grifting and getting rich, and will fight back ruthlessly. Not very appealing to speak out.
-
Scott, I don't think you're being realistic here. This whistleblower would be universally CONDEMNED by the establishment and their stenographers in the worldwide media. They would be relentlessly attacked bc there's trillions in potential tax $$ at stake here. It's a serious game
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Religious devotion to an apocalyptic fantasy VS socialist conspiracy? Which one is most likely? Wait! There's a difference between these two? Whistle Blowing wouldn't work in this case because... They have Pre-Labeled you a Denier! (Persuasion 101)
-
How many people have stepped up as whistleblowers about the media's collusion narrative in the past few years? A few, yet it still continues.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
ok, so can we just agree that they're incompetent then since the data sets are verifiable garbage?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Remember Kahneman: Wherever there are gaps in understanding, the mind is not blank. It tries to apply narratives - stereotypes - to those gaps. But, what happens when science + science journalists erect an informational wall b/t them + public? http://www.slideshare.net/jeranbinning/thinking-fast-andslow …pic.twitter.com/R5PBLsIeeO
-
What Kahneman found is that intuition only works if you have a good process to evolve it over time. In the case of science, the scientists + journalists rarely provide all of the context which is necessary to facilitate the formation of accurate intuition.pic.twitter.com/JsvWHLsuCV
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Could not those same motivations you site be motivations for continuing to prop up "Climate Change"? Could multiple people in control of data etc be motivated in the same way at the same time?
-
Sure. It's just deeply unlikely none of them would get caught and no whistleblowers.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.