I'm providing @ScottAdamsSays with lots of valuable information about climate. Unfortunate that he isn't taking advantage of it.
-
-
Replying to @Tony__Heller @SteveSGoddard
That's because you lost all credibility by imagining nefarious intentions where there is nothing like that in evidence. The Climategate emails that you believe prove intention are where you lost me entirely.
68 replies 7 retweets 106 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
Of course Scott. They are "accidentally" using 50% fake data to turn cooling into warming. No nefarious intent. https://realclimatescience.com/2019/04/understanding-noaa-us-temperature-fraud-2/ …pic.twitter.com/OA3CBeRPUp
This media may contain sensitive material. Learn more
4 replies 18 retweets 106 likes -
Replying to @Tony__Heller @SteveSGoddard
Thousands of scientists across the world are all "in on it"? If you hypothesized they were wrong or suffering from confirmation bias, I could take it seriously. But when you go full-tin-hat, everything else you say turns to dust.
32 replies 0 retweets 24 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
Straw man argument. The temperature record is handled by a small handful of people, perhaps a dozen. Would you also argue that "thousands of FBI agents" couldn't have conspired against President Trump? All it takes is for a few key people to misbehave.
8 replies 17 retweets 153 likes -
Replying to @Tony__Heller @SteveSGoddard
Actually, I make that same argument in my upcoming book as a reason to not trust peer review to catch temperature data errors. But it would still be unlikely for a dozen people (per proxy) in different parts of the globe to all be in on this alleged con.
22 replies 0 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
Another straw man argument. If you look at the poor coverage and history of how the global temperature record has been altered over time, there is no question that the small groups of people have colluded to produce the same results. https://realclimatescience.com/overwhelming-evidence-of-collusion/ …
13 replies 18 retweets 91 likes -
Replying to @Tony__Heller @ScottAdamsSays
I have a very long and successful career at doing this sort of analysis on a multitude of engineering products. The reason your game console and computer microprocessors work, is largely due to my error analysis. Scott should be more careful. https://realclimatescience.com/who-is-tony-heller/ …pic.twitter.com/yeF5aKHlx2
This media may contain sensitive material. Learn more
11 replies 6 retweets 66 likes -
Replying to @Tony__Heller @SteveSGoddard
Did you build that thing with bad analogies? Impressive!
5 replies 0 retweets 13 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Intuition is magical thinking. We would all default to our biases. Nothing more.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.