Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
ScottAdamsSays's profile
Scott Adams
Scott Adams
Scott Adams
Verified account
@ScottAdamsSays

Tweets

Scott AdamsVerified account

@ScottAdamsSays

My Micro Lesson (2-4 min. videos) on being more happier and more effective in life are on Locals: http://bit.ly/2Ygv2tf 

Pleasanton CA
youtube.com/c/realCoffeeWi…
Joined October 2014

Tweets

  • © 2021 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays 23 Apr 2019
      Replying to @Tony__Heller @SteveSGoddard

      That's because you lost all credibility by imagining nefarious intentions where there is nothing like that in evidence. The Climategate emails that you believe prove intention are where you lost me entirely.

      68 replies 7 retweets 106 likes
    2. Tony Heller‏ @Tony__Heller 23 Apr 2019
      Replying to @ScottAdamsSays

      Of course Scott. They are "accidentally" using 50% fake data to turn cooling into warming. No nefarious intent. https://realclimatescience.com/2019/04/understanding-noaa-us-temperature-fraud-2/ …pic.twitter.com/OA3CBeRPUp

      This media may contain sensitive material. Learn more
      4 replies 18 retweets 106 likes
    3. Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays 23 Apr 2019
      Replying to @Tony__Heller @SteveSGoddard

      Thousands of scientists across the world are all "in on it"? If you hypothesized they were wrong or suffering from confirmation bias, I could take it seriously. But when you go full-tin-hat, everything else you say turns to dust.

      32 replies 0 retweets 24 likes
    4. Tony Heller‏ @Tony__Heller 23 Apr 2019
      Replying to @ScottAdamsSays

      Straw man argument. The temperature record is handled by a small handful of people, perhaps a dozen. Would you also argue that "thousands of FBI agents" couldn't have conspired against President Trump? All it takes is for a few key people to misbehave.

      8 replies 17 retweets 153 likes
    5. Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays 23 Apr 2019
      Replying to @Tony__Heller @SteveSGoddard

      Actually, I make that same argument in my upcoming book as a reason to not trust peer review to catch temperature data errors. But it would still be unlikely for a dozen people (per proxy) in different parts of the globe to all be in on this alleged con.

      22 replies 0 retweets 14 likes
    6. Tony Heller‏ @Tony__Heller 23 Apr 2019
      Replying to @ScottAdamsSays

      Another straw man argument. If you look at the poor coverage and history of how the global temperature record has been altered over time, there is no question that the small groups of people have colluded to produce the same results. https://realclimatescience.com/overwhelming-evidence-of-collusion/ …

      13 replies 18 retweets 91 likes
    7. Tony Heller‏ @Tony__Heller 23 Apr 2019
      Replying to @Tony__Heller @ScottAdamsSays

      I have a very long and successful career at doing this sort of analysis on a multitude of engineering products. The reason your game console and computer microprocessors work, is largely due to my error analysis. Scott should be more careful. https://realclimatescience.com/who-is-tony-heller/ …pic.twitter.com/yeF5aKHlx2

      This media may contain sensitive material. Learn more
      11 replies 6 retweets 66 likes
    8. Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays 23 Apr 2019
      Replying to @Tony__Heller @SteveSGoddard

      Did you build that thing with bad analogies? Impressive!

      5 replies 0 retweets 13 likes
    9. Tony Heller‏ @Tony__Heller 23 Apr 2019
      Replying to @ScottAdamsSays

      It would be great to be a fly on the wall in your office and find out what your agenda actually is.

      10 replies 3 retweets 28 likes
    10. Eeyore was the cheerful one in the family.‏ @QuixotesDonkey 23 Apr 2019
      Replying to @Tony__Heller @SteveSGoddard @ScottAdamsSays

      If Scott wanted to be completely rigorous about the data and decide based on that, and was able, he would do it and come to the same conclusion all skeptics have. Scott uses the media to guide conversations, experiment with persuasion, test responses. This is not about climate.

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
      Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays 23 Apr 2019
      Replying to @QuixotesDonkey @SteveSGoddard

      You think I could independently evaluate climate science if I just put a little more effort into it? 🙄

      11:57 AM - 23 Apr 2019
      • 6 Likes
      • Justin Browsin Kevin Watson Bob 🌿Zebbu Silvi Simberg B. Machiavelli
      4 replies 0 retweets 6 likes
        1. Clark Magnuson‏ @Clarkmag2 23 Apr 2019
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @QuixotesDonkey @SteveSGoddard

          Scott could learn more about the history of climate.

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. Eeyore was the cheerful one in the family.‏ @QuixotesDonkey 23 Apr 2019
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @SteveSGoddard

          You don't need to. There are obvious things that act as a BS detector for the entire CO2/temp claim. It's like an alibi for a suspect in a murder case. To quote Feynman, if your theory doesn't describe nature, it's wrong. AGW is a claim that's strongly contradicted by observation

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. New conversation
        2. nadinecarroll‏ @nadinecarroll 23 Apr 2019
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @QuixotesDonkey @SteveSGoddard

          Scott, I think you could evaluate a bad-faith effort to ‘cook the books’ of temperature data if you put your mind into it. Don’t need a Ph.D. for that.

          1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
        3. Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays 23 Apr 2019
          Replying to @nadinecarroll @QuixotesDonkey @SteveSGoddard

          No, I can’t read minds.

          2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
        4. Show replies
        1. Art Kilner‏ @RamblingAK 23 Apr 2019
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @QuixotesDonkey @SteveSGoddard

          A LOT more. If, that is, you already understand partial differential equations. Otherwise I'd say you're SOL.

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2021 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info