That's because you lost all credibility by imagining nefarious intentions where there is nothing like that in evidence. The Climategate emails that you believe prove intention are where you lost me entirely.
-
-
Scott could learn more about the history of climate.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You don't need to. There are obvious things that act as a BS detector for the entire CO2/temp claim. It's like an alibi for a suspect in a murder case. To quote Feynman, if your theory doesn't describe nature, it's wrong. AGW is a claim that's strongly contradicted by observation
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Scott, I think you could evaluate a bad-faith effort to ‘cook the books’ of temperature data if you put your mind into it. Don’t need a Ph.D. for that.
-
No, I can’t read minds.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
A LOT more. If, that is, you already understand partial differential equations. Otherwise I'd say you're SOL.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
