I'm providing @ScottAdamsSays with lots of valuable information about climate. Unfortunate that he isn't taking advantage of it.
-
-
interesting is the improving of data only went one way
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's not really "collusion" per se, that suggests malicious intent, it's more a brainwashed orthodoxy that blinds either side to rationally discussing the aberrations in data and methodologies. It's like a Climate Derangement Syndrome.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
And is not part of the scientific debate. Motives come into play when considering consequences for the proponents of either side, once the truth has been discovered.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
Given the extremely poor global coverage, it would be statistically impossible to produce graphs which agree this closely without collusion.pic.twitter.com/ubghzVEeKO
This media may contain sensitive material. Learn more
-
Climategate is the definition of collusion.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Scott, you clearly lack the knowledge to debate the factual points Steve makes. Why not continu your proposal for a debate between Steve and any climate highpriest? Or is your leftism braking up your clear thinking again?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.