Because: 1. Mann claims tree-rings reliably show temperature for 1000 years. 2. McIntyre proves "hockey stick" graph wrong. 3. Osborn, Briffa, et. al. create "spaghetti charts" from corrected proxy data. 4. They overlay inst. data, erase divergence... "hockey stick proved!" https://twitter.com/ScottAdamsSays/status/1120686403434663936 …
-
-
No. It was a reconstruction of the last thousand years of Earth's temperature.
-
You are trying to sell me on the idea that Mann's hockey stick graph was not intended to tell us where future temperatures are heading? Was it just for fun?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.