Because: 1. Mann claims tree-rings reliably show temperature for 1000 years. 2. McIntyre proves "hockey stick" graph wrong. 3. Osborn, Briffa, et. al. create "spaghetti charts" from corrected proxy data. 4. They overlay inst. data, erase divergence... "hockey stick proved!" https://twitter.com/ScottAdamsSays/status/1120686403434663936 …
-
-
No, you have been hoodwinked because you did not understand the nature of the scandal. The fact that the paleoclimate chapter of the IPCC was an incestuous group that engaged in banana-republic levels of corruption says nothing about whether Climate Change is really happening.
-
I'm on board with the idea that the historical temperature proxies are less reliable than modern measurements, which are also not entirely credible to me. But intention to mislead is not in evidence. Intention to market using bullshit is very much in evidence.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.