I'm providing @ScottAdamsSays with lots of valuable information about climate. Unfortunate that he isn't taking advantage of it.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I didn't do anything wrong. Scott is making excuses.
- Show replies
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
None of that happened in my reality.
End of conversation
-
-
-
Correct. The ClimateGate emails don't prove anything. But, the code leaked does. I studied the CRU IDL code that tabulates the data all the scientists used for their projections. This proved to me they screw w/ the data to fit their desired outcome.https://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/04/climategate-the-smoking-code/ …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Of course Scott. They are "accidentally" using 50% fake data to turn cooling into warming. No nefarious intent. https://realclimatescience.com/2019/04/understanding-noaa-us-temperature-fraud-2/ …pic.twitter.com/OA3CBeRPUp
This media may contain sensitive material. Learn more
-
Thousands of scientists across the world are all "in on it"? If you hypothesized they were wrong or suffering from confirmation bias, I could take it seriously. But when you go full-tin-hat, everything else you say turns to dust.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
scott, the oil lobby has _been knowing_ about climate change since the 70s, and yet they (nefariously) intended to continue to maximize their profits despite the risk. Do you stand up for the tobacco executives too?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I didn't imply nefarious intentions, but now that you mention it, the data does strongly suggest Tony is secretly paid by big oil. There is no direct evidence of such a thing, but how else can you explain him implying collusion without evidence? (See what I did there?)
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.