Because: 1. Mann claims tree-rings reliably show temperature for 1000 years. 2. McIntyre proves "hockey stick" graph wrong. 3. Osborn, Briffa, et. al. create "spaghetti charts" from corrected proxy data. 4. They overlay inst. data, erase divergence... "hockey stick proved!" https://twitter.com/ScottAdamsSays/status/1120686403434663936 …
-
-
You must be new to the discussion, then... I'll unpack it for you: 1. MBH 98/99 is a graph created by Michael Mann and popularized by Al Gore and the IPCC. It purported to show that current warming is "unprecedented in the last 1000 years," diminishing the importance of...pic.twitter.com/xcRBeqGV1r
-
...the medieval warm period in the popular imagination. One of the controversial hacked emails had Paul Overstreet (if I remember right) saying "we must get rid of the medieval warm period."
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Scott adams confirmed brainlet
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It does if you followed the story as it unfolded and understand what each of the points refers to, and the science / mathematics behind it...
-
Then go look at the alleged principle of "teleconnection", whereby a particular tree somehow grows in response to the average "global temperature field" and not to its local temp, sunlight, nutrients, water etc. Ask yourself whether that's in the slightest bit plausible.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It made sense to me.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.