What did he get wrong? I’ve been saying since the start that Uranium-One was probably not illegal and definitely not important.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @JackPosobiec
That doesn't address illegal or unimportant, which are my position. Sounds legal, and I still see no importance to it.
20 replies 2 retweets 27 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @JackPosobiec
Legal, unimportant? How much money was put into the Clinton Foundation for access to that Uranium? That Uranium belonged to the American People. Ever cent that was paid for access to the Uranium belongs to The People not the Clinton Foundation.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @JackPosobiec
Yeah. I guess the 33,000 deleted emails, destroyed PCs, smashed phones and a bleach bit hidden server was all because she didn't want her secret recipes getting out. So you are saying that this reporting is factually wrong? https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
What crime does it describe? It is legal to donate to political people and their foundations in the hope of influencing them. And uranium is available for purchase on the world market. That didn't change.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.