What did he get wrong? I’ve been saying since the start that Uranium-One was probably not illegal and definitely not important.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @JackPosobiec
That doesn't address illegal or unimportant, which are my position. Sounds legal, and I still see no importance to it.
20 replies 2 retweets 27 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @JackPosobiec
Do you account for bad faith shenanigans? Why would someone 'donate' $131M to a (~Faux) Foundation?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @TaiDecker @JackPosobiec
We know it wasn't about Uranium-One because of the timing. The donor had already sold his stake in the company years earlier. But of course the Clinton Foundation was about influence. It just happened to be legal if everyone played it smart.
7:14 PM - 16 Apr 2019
1 reply
0 retweets
2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.