What did he get wrong? I’ve been saying since the start that Uranium-One was probably not illegal and definitely not important.
-
-
Yeah but 145 million clams to your foundation? That's a lot of clams.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's only illegal if you can tie Russian payments to the Clinton Foundation and Bill's speeches to the Uranium one approval. The importance was the appearance of taking bribes. Now that her political career is over the relevance is over unless you can actually prove a bribe.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
In a vacuum, U1 might be legal. I think the big question involves donations to CF in exchange for U1 deal.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Nice
End of conversation
-
-
-
She has admitted to this pay attention @ShepNewsTeam
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I have switched to believe that too. Uranium is not Rare. US could ramp up, but cost is much cheaper abroad.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think the quid pro quo, i.e., Bill Clinton getting a $500,000 speaking fee is the problem.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is payment to the Clinton Foundation from the Russians after the sale legal? I was under the impression it was not.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The Russians made a big stupid ploy for uranium ore, which was at the top of the commodities bubble. Hillary was unethical but likely legal doing business.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.