What did he get wrong? I’ve been saying since the start that Uranium-One was probably not illegal and definitely not important.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @JackPosobiec
Love ya bro, but you're wrong on this one. Read the
@peterschweizer book. I still have nightmares.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Tell me what Smith got wrong.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Read the book. Yesterday was the straw that broke the back of my ability to be in the same room when he is on tv.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HarryDogood @ScottAdamsSays and
His fundamental argument was that she was just one of the people heading departments to approve. That would be a correct argument if we weren't dealing with a corrupt ADMINISTRATION. Buckle up for Thurs. I've tried to figure out how it all all of this is not coming out.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HarryDogood @ScottAdamsSays and
I love how Sheps argument and Scott’s endorsement of it is oh she was just a cog-one of the people who signed off on it like she has no influence. Do they know she was the brains behind the Libya regime change war.. Oh but the Obama, DOD, etc all had to sign off on that too.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MatrixForest @DigitalForests and
Scott didn't endorse. He asked. If someone I respect asks. I respond. That's how we will eventually figure this shit out.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HarryDogood @ScottAdamsSays and
Not sure what you’re arguing here. Scott agrees with Sheps commentary = endorsed it. Shep downplayed Hillary’s roll in uranium one. My point was she had far more influence on Obama admin policy & deals as proven by her selling the Libya war on Obama.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
My view is that there was no crime in any of this and the entire matter is of trivial importance. I wouldn't argue that the Clinton Foundation was angelic.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.