This is a must-read for anyone concerned about green energy and climate change. But it is curiously silent on #GreenNuclearDealhttps://twitter.com/notfubar/status/1115587452708765697 …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- End of conversation
-
-
-
Since there is no prospect for any kind of storage, neither chemically nor physically, a sound solution appears out of range. Why is it? Because the base load of any power grid has constantly be ensured to avoid daylong power failure. The consequences would be horrible.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
As a matter of fact: the so called "Energiewende" in Germany, set up in 1998, was not able to replace only one conventional power plant and therefore led to an increase in the output of climate gas like co2.pic.twitter.com/VFvxgYNpTw
-
The above table is used to convince Germans, that "Energiewende" is working. And people fall into this trap, because they don't distinguish between production and consumption. Since wind an sun have still be backed by 100%, production has gone up, consumption stayed constant.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
It increases climate risks more than fossil fuels.
-
Anyway, if you want to see how things will go, study Germany.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Mike Shellenberger
@ShellenbergerMD wrote about this a year ago: https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelshellenberger/2018/05/23/if-solar-panels-are-so-clean-why-do-they-produce-so-much-toxic-waste/#222a4ba3121c … -
You have to watch the Greens [im Deutchland, Bündnis 90/Die Grünen] closely. They have mastered the "bait and switch" game in the US. Examples are pushing the CFL bulb over the old incandescent, with no nation-wide plan for disposal, & stopping hydro in CA in favor of nukes.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.