@ScottAdamsSays excellent explanation for where the fake 97% agree comes from. You really need to understand before you continue to promote their lies. I don't have link, but recall interviews where scientists tried to get this number debunked but the purveyors refused to changehttps://twitter.com/CampersHaven/status/1114869754987253761 …
-
-
Well I appreciate your checking it out...but why would 97% be credible on its face? Remember we are talking about "caused by man" not whether the temperature is rising during this time...
-
Even most skeptics agree some warming is human caused.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
The "97%" nonsense is a semantic bait-and-switch. There may be 97% of scientists (or papers) that take "anthropogenic global warming" seriously as probably explaining part of the recent warming. Then the fanatics claim "97%" agree with their own extreme claims
-
Exactly...I've watched videos and read many articles about this. One compelling argument was elimination of scientists who were "climate deniers" from the pool by denying them government grants and making it impossible for them to have their work published. Obama regulated this.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.