Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
ScottAdamsSays's profile
Scott Adams
Scott Adams
Scott Adams
Verified account
@ScottAdamsSays

Tweets

Scott AdamsVerified account

@ScottAdamsSays

My Micro Lesson (2-4 min. videos) on being more happier and more effective in life are on Locals: http://bit.ly/2Ygv2tf 

Pleasanton CA
youtube.com/c/realCoffeeWi…
Joined October 2014

Tweets

  • © 2021 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. This Tweet is unavailable.
    2. Atomsk's Sanakan‏ @AtomsksSanakan 4 Apr 2019
      Replying to @Geopilot @GeraldKehl and

      Re: "That article is not helpful to your case !" And you have no rational, evidence-based explanation for that claim of your's. Your usual baseless, paranoid conspiracy theories are of no relevance to me.

      1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
    3. Jerry Kehl‏ @GeraldKehl 4 Apr 2019
      Replying to @AtomsksSanakan @Geopilot and

      Oh brother....the whole climate change hysteria is a complete conspiracy theory...based on 100 years of manipulated data and some correlation of C02 and 1 degree of change - all well within a margin of error of nothing.

      3 replies 1 retweet 6 likes
    4. The Id of a Scientist‏ @scientificid 4 Apr 2019
      Replying to @GeraldKehl @AtomsksSanakan and

      Not one word of that is actually accurate. We have far more than a century’s data, countless proxies beyond direct measurements which are extensor well established and have held up to extensive scrutiny, and no the margin of error relative to change isn’t what you seem to think.

      1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
    5. Jerry Kehl‏ @GeraldKehl 4 Apr 2019
      Replying to @scientificid @AtomsksSanakan and

      Except you must ignore a lot of data - like the Greenland numbers and the US....1.5 C....so what....why do we think that is a bad thing? Western civilization was started by the European warming. We just don't know. We - you can't know that for certain. It's amazing the arrogance

      1 reply 1 retweet 7 likes
    6. The Id of a Scientist‏ @scientificid 4 Apr 2019
      Replying to @GeraldKehl @AtomsksSanakan and

      When we discuss climate we talk about global systems. Even in the present warming there were regions where there was a net decline. That doesn’t mean the global change isn’t positive. Nobody is ignoring Greenland. I’m really not sure where you’re getting your info from. Sources!

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    7. Jerry Kehl‏ @GeraldKehl 4 Apr 2019
      Replying to @scientificid @AtomsksSanakan and

      Exactly my point. Again how do we know the 1 degree is bad? how do we know it will keep rising when all the past models have been incorrect? I'm asking real questions here - not trying to attack. I just don't understand the arrogance of the claims of knowing the planet that well

      4 replies 1 retweet 6 likes
    8. Atomsk's Sanakan‏ @AtomsksSanakan 5 Apr 2019
      Replying to @GeraldKehl @scientificid and

      Re: "how do we know it will keep rising when all the past models have been incorrect?" You simply fabricated that claim, as per your politically-motivated denialism https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-how-well-have-climate-models-projected-global-warming … https://twitter.com/AtomsksSanakan/status/920531988255211520 …pic.twitter.com/cabB0oWyPA

      1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
    9. Jerry Kehl‏ @GeraldKehl 5 Apr 2019
      Replying to @AtomsksSanakan @scientificid and

      No the predictions have been way off since they were made in the 70's. Ice melt, ocean levels...all way off.

      4 replies 1 retweet 9 likes
    10. Jeff Segor‏ @JSegor 5 Apr 2019
      Replying to @GeraldKehl @AtomsksSanakan and

      The key is that multiple, independent data lead to the same conclusion: the trend of warming is up. Also that the patterns we see correspond to: Anthropogenic CO2 + Natural Variability = AGWpic.twitter.com/nccwZz2W1x

      7 replies 0 retweets 5 likes
      Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays 5 Apr 2019
      Replying to @JSegor @GeraldKehl and

      Can you give me the layperson explanation of why the graph that clearly disproves a C02 correlation with temperature is actually the best evidence of C02 driving temperature? What I see here is a similar rate of increase in periods with wildly different C02.

      9:19 AM - 5 Apr 2019
      • 7 Retweets
      • 28 Likes
      • RationalClimate Paul Bischoff 🇺🇸 вlş 🇺🇲⚔⭐Readyfor deanna caswell Lazaro Lunch77 Kevin Watson KingofBS
      14 replies 7 retweets 28 likes
        1. New conversation
        2. Tony Heller‏ @Tony__Heller 5 Apr 2019
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @JSegor and

          Here is the 1990 IPCC graph for temperatures over the past 1,000 years. There is no correlation to CO2. The whole thing is mass superstition.pic.twitter.com/OpBRfxFzu9

          This media may contain sensitive material. Learn more
          6 replies 35 retweets 70 likes
        3. Jon A‏ @Is2021OverYet 5 Apr 2019
          Replying to @Tony__Heller @SteveSGoddard and

          The most difficult part for alarmists to explain is that CO2 doesn't correlate with temps on all time scales - decadal, centennial, millenial, and beyond. During the few brief periods where there is a correlation, temps always lead CO2. It's the elephant in the room for AGW.

          0 replies 2 retweets 8 likes
        4. End of conversation
        1. Jay‏ @jaybird9191 5 Apr 2019
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @JSegor and

          Scott for C02 to be a driver of temp C02 would have to rise first. There is no chart that shows C02 rising first. Every charts shows temps rise first. It’s temps that drive C02

          0 replies 1 retweet 5 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. New conversation
        2. Jeff Segor‏ @JSegor 5 Apr 2019
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @GeraldKehl and

          1) Graph shows no CO2, just shows temperature 2) 1891-1950 GA + Natural Variability roughly equal influence 3) 1951-1975 GA warming offset by natural cooling (AMO) 4) 1976-1997 GA forcing dominated warming 5) 2001-2013 strongest GA warming, offset by -solar + la nina GA = GHG

          3 replies 0 retweets 5 likes
        3. Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays 6 Apr 2019
          Replying to @JSegor @GeraldKehl and

          Thank you. Interestingly, this puts the lie to "unprecedented rate of warming," which is the primary claim the public hears about climate change. Apparently the real story doesn't sell, as in "First time we are sure CO2 is the driver, but increases like this are common."

          8 replies 4 retweets 15 likes
        4. Show replies
        1. New conversation
        2. Jeff Segor‏ @JSegor 5 Apr 2019
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @GeraldKehl and

          Hard to put a 17-page paper results in a Tweet. In Layman's terms, early in the century natural variability + GA ( CO2+ aerosols) were roughly equal, but for each of the periods, the warming was either increased or decreased by known natural variations.

          3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
        3. Tony Heller‏ @Tony__Heller 5 Apr 2019
          Replying to @JSegor @ScottAdamsSays and

          Rather impressive gibberish, Jeff.

          2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
        4. Show replies

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2021 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info