China and Russia are required to do nothing for more than 10 years while the trillions that the rest of the world pays goes to developing nations on the premise of building more CO2 stingy green infastructure
-
-
Replying to @mrmonks01 @JSegor and
No one is required to do anything, with carbon fees you can tax chinese goods based on that and force them to do something about it.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Disingenuous at best, signers of the Paris accords have goals they are required to meet while china India and Russia are not required to meet any goals for at least 10 years, that’s a fact, go do some research before you come at me with BS. the primary reason Trump pulled US out
6 replies 2 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @mrmonks01 @JSegor and
The disingenuous part was your hoax of "all required to cut emissions by the Paris accord or pay trillions in tax"pic.twitter.com/ISUljpCIev
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Read all the carve outs yourself also that the developed countries are obligated to fund the building out of the undeveloped countriespic.twitter.com/Y7rgWixlJ5
3 replies 3 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @mrmonks01 @JSegor and
None of that is an obligation, it's a pledge of an undetermined amount to no one in particular. That was a remark by India that being the lowest developed with the most population and pending GDP growth that the target would only be reachable pending financial help.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
https://www.globalpolicy.org/social-and-economic-policy/global-taxes-1-79/energy-taxes/45866-global-carbon-tax-urged-at-un-climate-conference.html … one can't deny their agendapic.twitter.com/BCNeMgh0aE
3 replies 2 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @mrmonks01 @jwickers and
its naive and foolish to suggest that the real agenda is not massive global wealth redistribution
1 reply 2 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @mrmonks01 @jwickers and
Do you have a source for that conspiracy theory?
11 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @jwickers and
Sure but it’s not s conspiracy theory if the participants admit the agenda https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/22267-un-agenda-2030-a-recipe-for-global-socialism …pic.twitter.com/jmlCRrIRaM
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
You know anyone with Photoshop can put text on a photo, right?
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @mrmonks01 and
Or quote mine .. but the one from Edenhofer is taken from a German interview, so in context: https://www.nzz.ch/klimapolitik_verteilt_das_weltvermoegen_neu-1.8373227 …pic.twitter.com/NWetyDimnk
1 reply 2 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @jwickers @ScottAdamsSays and
Ok. Good read. The statement is in there and only slightly out of context. I wouldnt call it a myth. Still many positions here in question.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.