Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
ScottAdamsSays's profile
Scott Adams
Scott Adams
Scott Adams
Verified account
@ScottAdamsSays

Tweets

Scott AdamsVerified account

@ScottAdamsSays

My Micro Lesson (2-4 min. videos) on being more happier and more effective in life are on Locals: http://bit.ly/2Ygv2tf 

Pleasanton CA
youtube.com/c/realCoffeeWi…
Joined October 2014

Tweets

  • © 2021 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Dan‏ @ddasser 1 Apr 2019

      Dan Retweeted DonKeiller

      Hi @ScottAdamsSays - it is not only the US that shows no warming trend. Even foreign data marked as “raw” in the US datasets that everybody uses has been pre-adjusted at the country of origin to show warming trends that are not actually there. Here is proof.https://twitter.com/KeillerDon/status/1112611031916953600 …

      Dan added,

      DonKeiller @KeillerDon
      Man made warming. NASA adjusts “unadjusted” data, cooling the past to warm the present. That’s called fraud👎http://notrickszone.com/2019/03/31/fabricating-a-warming-nasa-now-altering-unadjusted-data-to-create-new-warmer-unadjusted-data/ … pic.twitter.com/ecZccCeUjw
      3 replies 5 retweets 17 likes
      Show this thread
    2. Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays 1 Apr 2019
      Replying to @ddasser

      You prefer the incorrect and unadjusted data?

      36 replies 2 retweets 21 likes
    3. Suomi-YOLO‏ @suomicitizen 1 Apr 2019
      Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @ddasser

      Neither sounds good. Incorrect should automatically be discarded as invalid and adjusted suggests bad methodology.

      1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
      Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays 1 Apr 2019
      Replying to @suomicitizen @ddasser

      Doesn't that depend on how accurate the adjustments are?

      6:59 AM - 1 Apr 2019
      • 3 Likes
      • 💧 Fair Dinkum Molly 🔥 Kevin Watson Jeremy Wickersheimer
      5 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
        1. New conversation
        2. Suomi-YOLO‏ @suomicitizen 1 Apr 2019
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @ddasser

          IMO A scientist should never correct results. If they are unexpected, the hypothesis or method were flawed. If a scientist adjusts output, it implies that both method and hypothesis are flawed.

          1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes
        3. Make America Grateful Again‏ @HoundiousPrime 1 Apr 2019
          Replying to @suomicitizen @ScottAdamsSays @ddasser

          Pseudoscience is different.

          0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        4. End of conversation
        1. Make America Grateful Again‏ @HoundiousPrime 1 Apr 2019
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @suomicitizen @ddasser

          We don't normally speak of adjustments as being "accurate." Measurements may be accurate or not but adjustments, by definition, are "manipulation."

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. New conversation
        2. Nick McGinley‏ @NickMcGinley1 1 Apr 2019
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @suomicitizen @ddasser

          How can anyone think they know how to make decades old measurements of the air temperature in a certain spot more accurate than the person who was there at the time? The monotony of the adjustments is evidence of the bias of the adjusters. Every adjustment favors their argument.pic.twitter.com/9c8oyOvH34

          2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        3. Jeremy Wickersheimer‏ @jwickers 1 Apr 2019
          Replying to @NickMcGinley1 @ScottAdamsSays and

          citation needed

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        4. Show replies
        1. Jeremy Wickersheimer‏ @jwickers 1 Apr 2019
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @suomicitizen @ddasser

          Does anyone here criticizing adjustements even know why they are done? .. this is such an old criticism, how many people have to look at them, do their own fair adjustments and find they agree with the ones being done before this myth goes to die?

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. This Tweet is unavailable.
        2. Alexander Bell‏ @A_C_Belly 1 Apr 2019
          Replying to @inthepitts @ScottAdamsSays and

          I believe you are not pulling in the same directions as the sea temperature sceptics. Everyone pretty much agrees the data is terrible, the question is how terrible and how do you go about applying the correction.

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        3. End of conversation
        1. New conversation
        2. HondaSabre‏ @HondaSabre 1 Apr 2019
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @suomicitizen @ddasser

          “Adjusting your data is inconsistent with the “scientific method”.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        3. HondaSabre‏ @HondaSabre 1 Apr 2019
          Replying to @HondaSabre @ScottAdamsSays and

          When I was getting my engineering degree, “adjusting your data” was called cheating. You’re supposed to throw away bad data, not tweak it to fit your theory.

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        4. End of conversation

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2021 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info