3. Demonstrate the ability to accurately predict future warming based not he hypothesis. So far, all of the IPCC models except 1 fail miserably on this point.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Only the Russian model, which predicts no big problem with warming. Or so I hear.
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @Geopilot and
You might want to talk to Zeke on the Russian model. He knows data.pic.twitter.com/aqTMVT9Fzh
3 replies 3 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @JSegor @ScottAdamsSays and3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
-
-
Replying to @JSegor @ScottAdamsSays and1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @mrmonks01 @ScottAdamsSays and
Next to last sentence: “But the ice losses we detect in West Antarctica are highly accurate, and outstrip by far the signal or uncertainty in East Antarctica,” he said. The complexity of Antarctica with respect to AGW was explained years ago in my climate science class.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @JSegor @ScottAdamsSays and
Shepherd’s paper cites Zwally’s 2015 study several times, but only estimates eastern Antarctic mass gains to be 5 gigatons a year — yet this estimate comes with a margin of error of 46 gigatons Zwally, on the other hand, claims ice sheet growth is anywhere from 50 gt to 200 gt
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mrmonks01 @ScottAdamsSays and
I am losing track of all my links. What I am doing, by-the-way is creating what I call "Quests" on my debating system I am developing to provide the best pro-con arguments to various climate questions. I have several quest lines going on. Hence, the counterclaim requests.pic.twitter.com/g6870silaW
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
Interesting approach.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.