Pro-life rhetorical strategy is worthy of its own thread I've thought for a while that the pro-life movement was shooting itself in the foot They were relying on DISGUST at the expense of RIDICULEhttps://twitter.com/CShadegg/status/1111661867087200256 …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I don't understand why he refuses to acknowledge this. The "hospice" context is false, verifiably.
- Show replies
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Incorrect. The law clearly says allowing a healthy Downs baby to die from neglect after it is born is murder. No one has suggested otherwise.
- Show replies
-
-
-
it's a slippery slope with Dems, THAT is the issue.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Argh!!!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Curious for your thoughts on the above meme generally The way I think about it - it's SLIGHTLY unfair, and ambiguous on the "hoax part" Which is ideal - because the counter "We're not saying kill babies, we're saying late-term abortion is ok!" is defensive/unpersuasive
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's actually a perfect setup, because the counter is "aaackshually, we just want to be able to suck the baby's brains out the day before it's born. As long as it's still inside the mother, we can kill it." It starts an interesting discussion about how arbitrary the line can be
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.