Ignoring IQ arguments about large populations might be the best way to run a planet. That would be my first choice. But it would be hard to do an experiment with a proper control to know for sure which path is optimal.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
If people are constantly being lied to about basic animal husbandry, they will never be able to breed better children as a whole. The majority of IQ differences are caused by environmental factors over millennia but one major group. That other group have a cultural pressure.
End of conversation
-
-
-
That's the trick. IQ doesn't reflect ethics, loyalty, or personality. Personality & skills tests don't reflect morals or ethics. No point in lumping groups together outside of their personal actions. Best way to sort people is by their level personal responsibility & ethics.
-
See my answer above.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Nice! Media training in action. Answer the question you want to answer, not the one (implicitly) asked.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Disparate Impact doesn't allow to sort it out. And industrial grade resentment driven by identity politics. You know that facts don't matter. Groups that underperform will always blame your measurement system as "racist".
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Its what we call a resume and background check
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.