I think I trust Dr Patrick Michaels over you
Jim Monks
added,
https://video.foxnews.com/v/5851667173001/ … …
-
-
Replying to @mrmonks01 @geoffmprice and
I’ll put his resume against yours any dayhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patrick_Michaels …
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mrmonks01 @Fiddlers__Green and
Feel free. But appealing to an outlier authority who disputes an overwhelming consensus in science is a sharp fallacy. https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/appeal-to-authority … (And I'll personally put evidence, the U.S. Nat'l Academy of Sciences & 99% of nobel laureates in physics against his resume any day.)
8 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @geoffmprice @Fiddlers__Green and
still with the consensus??? consensus is not science its opinion, but what about your resume since you seem to be so confident
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @mrmonks01 @geoffmprice and
Re: "consensus is not science its opinion"
Please finally learn what "evidence-based scientific consensus" is.
Or do you also think human evolution is not science, but just opinion?
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/278682043_Analyzing_Hominin_Hominin_Phylogeny_Cladistic_Approach …pic.twitter.com/HJ4lYkWP0C
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AtomsksSanakan @geoffmprice and
You not only didn’t answer the question ,you berate me fir being skeptical. Actually it’s called “theory of evolution “ and a theory by definition is not scientifically proven it’s opinion , as to consensus it has no place in science . Galileo said this about consensuspic.twitter.com/bpXlI3aApd
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @mrmonks01 @AtomsksSanakan and
Incorrect. In casual language, “theory” means “maybe.” In science, that’s called a hypothesis, whereas “theory” means proven for all practical purposes. But science also allows new data to change any theory.
4 replies 1 retweet 7 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @AtomsksSanakan and
Yes and no , by definition if a theory can change ,then it wasn’t proven 100% , it was best guess based on prior evidence. A proven theory then becomes a law ,which is 100% backed up by experiment
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mrmonks01 @AtomsksSanakan and
Science doesn't say "theory" is something that is proven 100%. More like 99.99%, as in deeply unlikely to be overturned, so for all practical purposes a fact while not being 100% a fact.
4 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @AtomsksSanakan and
Semantics, lol if not 100% proven ie law, wether 60% or 99.9% backed by experiment it’s still a best guess based on current evidence and not a fact or law physics relies on provable expected reproducible results 100% of the time 99.9% is not enough
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Our topic is literally about the definition of a word. If your argument is that I appealed to semantics in a conversation about the definition of a word, check your thinking.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.