Scott Adams makes a new climate change challenge, and talks about Mr. Kellyanne Conway, and more. With coffee.https://www.pscp.tv/w/b2I-rTExODgwMjU5fDF5b0tNandMRUJPR1GKVJDjDD-pk57vPQ-9HXigLyNeCU58Y9WQUP0bxmhkKw== …
Wouldn't mean anything to me. Seeing either the skeptical argument or the alarmist argument is isolation is useless.
-
-
Yes, but there is key data that is rarely mentioned, if at all, when talking about the Vostok Ice Sheet data. Dust. It speaks directly to CO2 and it's proposed effects and is based on data alone. Now, it doesn't say the data is correct but that how it is interpreted matters.
-
For example, which comes first, cause or effect? Any scientist would know that effect follows cause. Now, if someone stated that the proposed cause follows a measured effect, in time, then that would in fact be incorrect, correct? No skepticism or alarmism required.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.