Scott Adams makes a new climate change challenge, and talks about Mr. Kellyanne Conway, and more. With coffee.https://www.pscp.tv/w/b2I-rTExODgwMjU5fDF5b0tNandMRUJPR1GKVJDjDD-pk57vPQ-9HXigLyNeCU58Y9WQUP0bxmhkKw== …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Scott wrote: "Obviously you need to start over on the experiment" I think that's the crux of the misunderstanding. They appear to assume that you're adjusting the bad past data instead of starting over with only good data going forward, and discarding the past bad data. Yes?
End of conversation
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I blocked him for being unpleasant.
- Show replies
-
-
-
RE: Heller's bad data argument Using Scott's business analogy: when validating/correcting historical data, rarely do you find a trendline going in the opposite direction afterwards. The slope may be steeper or not, but usually not the other direction. This is what gives me pause
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Climate scientists are not starting over on the experiment - that’s not possible since we only have one timeline (leaving simulation theory aside).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
IDK if you will see this but I have argued with some of these experts and they do not understand how they are getting this wrong. Once you understand this you will see how everything they put out is wrong. All based on this simple math question. Which is the "right" answer?pic.twitter.com/0WPqlBnLfF
-
I will give you a clue. As in all things getting the right answer is dependent upon asking the right question.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.