This would be very easy to determine if only we could have access to the code behind the models. The snippets released in the ClimateGate emails looked decidedly dodgy.
-
-
-
AFAIK the code for most (all?) climate models is available for download. However, also AFAIK, every model is a confused tangle of modules from various sources, often going back decades. Much of it is in Fortran, compiling and linking are machine specific, etc.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Is the answer, "science"?
-
The answer is "it is science"!
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
It depends one which butterfly you observed flapping its wings six months ago.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I’m not that smart, but I have yet to see one model account for solar energy - it seems the sun is the only static thing in our universe.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Cc
@EcoSenseNow - any thoughts?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not a single real system acts with exponential or polynomial growth. There is always some kind of negative feedback. Somehow I cannot see it on a single IPCC model plot.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.