@ScottAdamsSays Strzok/Page "insurance policy" to spy on and discredit Trump campaign "Not in evidence"?
a) Stopping Trump was the context of the comment.
b) She also admitted there was no evidence prior to investigation, hence no legitimate cause to investigate Trump campaign.
-
-
Bottom line: Was a pretext & she is lying after the fact to cover tracks of this unprecedented spy op based on unvetted allegations of partisan origin OR She was legit scared Trump was colluding & pure coincidence that it might deter object of her hatred. You believe her?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There was no predicate to open the investigation. Allegations are not enough. The Insurance Policy was most likely burning an FBI asset (Carter Page), making false allegations against him, to secure a FISA warrant to spy on Trump campaign. They're not going to skate on this one.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.