Not true. If the child is nonviable then they can help put the infant out of the suffering it would face during life.
-
-
Nick Searcy, INTERNATIONAL FILM & TELEVISION STAR Retweeted Nick Searcy, INTERNATIONAL FILM & TELEVISION STAR
Nick Searcy, INTERNATIONAL FILM & TELEVISION STAR added,
Nick Searcy, INTERNATIONAL FILM & TELEVISION STARVerified account @yesnicksearcyReplying to @ScottAdamsSays @brian_holan and 2 othersNo you didn't. Not of me, anyway. but here it is again. "Until Cuomo signed New York’s new abortion law, preemies who survived a chemical abortion were legally protected. Now they can be deliberately denied treatment." https://nypost.com/2019/02/13/these-abortion-laws-arent-what-pro-choice-is-supposed-to-mean/ …9 replies 7 retweets 93 likes -
Hmm read an article from the New York Post or read the actual bill... i think im going to believe the actual bill.
5 replies 0 retweets 181 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
FFS, doesn’t anybody have the ability to read between the lines? Because you don’t, little sheepie.
6 replies 1 retweet 30 likes -
It’s a “read between the lines” situation? You’ll have to help me out because the fact check link we just read looks clear to me.
5 replies 1 retweet 13 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @yesnicksearcy and
This also assumes you’d find a doctor willing to kill a baby. “First do no harm.”
5 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @NonsenseEnd @ScottAdamsSays and
The fetus is not considered "alive" until birth.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Does any of that make the facts wrong?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
