Wrong context. You fell for the hoax. The issue is whether delivering the baby risked brain damage in the mother.
-
-
-
Replying to @yesnicksearcy @USA_First_2016 and
I only need one Democrat to say they agree with killing healthy (or viable) babies after birth to agree with you. The out of context videos are not that.
16 replies 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @yesnicksearcy and
Not sure why
@ScottAdamsSays is in denial. Of course Dem leaders won’t admit they don’t care about protecting these babies — but will say they support ‘protecting’ the mother’s decision. Just semantics. They did vote against the babies - fact....1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Klickthedick @yesnicksearcy and
Okay, now we are getting someplace. Your belief is based on mind-reading. That is what I was guessing.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @yesnicksearcy and
‘Mind-reading.’ Well, I guess we are all guilty of that - if that’s what you want to call the subjective evaluation and critical thinking resulting from observation. It’s all opinion. A ‘statement’ can be a lie. “Action is the only truth.”
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Klickthedick @ScottAdamsSays and
You just successfully rebutted yourself. Congratulations!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Munchensenton @ScottAdamsSays and
Well, maybe. Or maybe I’m just pointing out
@ScottAdamsSays ‘s disingenuousness or naivety. No ‘professional’ politician is going to admit they don’t mind baby-killing. But their ‘action’ supports it. Nah, think I won the argument....1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Klickthedick @Munchensenton and
I can simplify: Can we find any human being who argues in favor of killing healthy babies after birth?
8 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Show me the language of a bill that does what you say.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.