The Chinese now can.
-
-
Replying to @pelchat_gerald @tan123 and
Ironically, there is no greater “pro-Putin” policy than “climate change” & the GND. Just look how Europe’s “green” movement has given economic might to Russia as quixotic environmentalists shiver under their frozen windmills begging for Russian NatGas We live in Orwellian times.
2 replies 6 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @t_ftop @pelchat_gerald and
Meanwhile, nuclear power is also rejected, even though it is the only way to have reliable power with zero CO2 emissions. Does it not seem strange the one way of actually preventing any CO2 emissions is not only not embraced, but is actively rejected? Reject the only solution?
2 replies 2 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @NickMcGinley1 @t_ftop and
Well, not the only solution, obviously. But yes, it has been a conflict within environmental groups for decades now. In market economics you'd resolve this by getting prices to reflect major environmental impact (carbon pricing) and let market decide.pic.twitter.com/6IVBRSjauR
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @geoffmprice @NickMcGinley1 and
Anyone who thinks carbon has a deleterious impact on the environment should purchase an indoor growing facility and try to run the business by reducing CO2 to under 300PPM. Carbon is the essence of life and “carbon pricing” is an evil effort to tax life.
4 replies 10 retweets 21 likes -
Replying to @t_ftop @NickMcGinley1 and
There is someone named "Green Conservatism" who liked this tweet.

Can't make this stuff up.
Spectroscopy ≠ photosynthesis.
What do textbooks say?
https://geosci.uchicago.edu/~rtp1/papers/PhysTodayRT2011.pdf …1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @geoffmprice @t_ftop and
How is the "essence of life" killing off billions of coral across ~half the 1,800 mile Great Barrier Reef over ~12 months? Radiative transfer theory explains how the greenhouse effect works & causes global warming, including rapid warming of the oceans.https://pressingwax.wordpress.com/2018/02/04/on-coral-alarmism/ …
3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @MikeBara9 @t_ftop and
Except according to thermometers and satellites. (But pretty easy for the
to alter those instruments, for sure, as part of the global plan. Stay skeptical.)pic.twitter.com/XXwnKmY5RE
7 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
I don’t trust any graphs on this topic. Typically the response is that the data is wrong.
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @geoffmprice and
I agree that it is hard to know what is real and what it fiction, and that this is a large problem. This graph, for context, comes from a lecture given by a man, Dr. Richard Lindzen, who is a world reknown atmospheric physicist and was a professor at MIThttps://youtu.be/ERGy5JZezEY
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @NickMcGinley1 @ScottAdamsSays and
He has oodles of video talks and lectures on you tube. If and when you have the time, you might want to check out a few. Just for context.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.