Scott Adams presents a persuasion scorecard for politics so far this year. Who is winning? With coffee.https://www.pscp.tv/w/b001WjExODgwMjU5fDFZcEtrVk5ua1BCeGrHah3kQly9oZj6NGj0_7n3R-nkIUycjjd13jCv23-hbQ== …
-
-
We need a different word for legal rights to distinguish them from natural rights.
-
Liberties?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What if the government is dissolved or completely bankrupt and can no longer provide health insurance? Even under anarchy people retain the right to speech and self defense. Rights, as I understand them, are freedoms the Govt can't take away.
-
The ones that no one can take away are "inalienable rights". Even if the government (or anyone) acts against them, they still exist. Though legal rights extending past natural/inalienable rights should be extremely limited. Health care should certainly not be in that realm.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Well, if he would have a literal army instead of a virtual one behind him he could opt to stay. But the US army would not do such a thing. No conservative, in his right mind, would support a dictatorship, or opt for more terms. See the joke/Freudian Slip?
@ScottAdamsSays saw it
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.