This climate argument looks persuasive to me. Is there a counter-argument?https://twitter.com/patbhamilton/status/1100131542045806592 …
-
-
I don't think they "forgot". The conventional wisdom is that the IPCC et. al. were charged with finding human causes, so that's what they focused on, to the exclusion of alternatives. I recommend this book (published 15 months ago) for background.https://www.amazon.com/Searching-Catastrophe-Signal-Origins-Intergovernmental/dp/0993118992/ref=pd_ybh_a_4?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1&refRID=2WZJ2C83218K464EKT6T …
-
This is Dr. Judith Curry's review of the Bernie Lewin book: "Short summary: scientists sought political relevance and allowed policy makers to put a big thumb on the scale of the scientific assessment of the attribution of climate change."https://judithcurry.com/2018/01/03/manufacturing-consensus-the-early-history-of-the-ipcc/ …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I haven't seen any persuasive arguments that solar behaviour is causing climate change. But what I have seen is that there is much more that we don't understand about the sun than what we do understand. So I think it's a mistake to uncritically rule it out as a cause.
-
It's still a young and developing science.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.