This climate argument looks persuasive to me. Is there a counter-argument?https://twitter.com/patbhamilton/status/1100131542045806592 …
-
-
"Improving quality of data" is word salad Scott. You are being an asshole.
-
Scott needs to go to the
#RWRI so he can learn that in some things the order of events matter eg ironing your clothes before washing is different than ironing them after - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Fudging means to "present or deal with (something) in a vague, noncommittal, or inadequate way, especially so as to conceal the truth or mislead." Fudging does not mean "changing data in any way," including corrections. Vaguely calling corrective adjustments fudging is misleading
- Show replies
-
-
-
Introducing your own confirmation biases into the measured data.....does NOT increase data quality. Data quality is increased by gathering more data from various diverse sources, not by "correcting" the data.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Scott, you have made a respectable effort to examine climate arguments on all sides. Listen to Joe here. He knows what he’s saying. You can’t look at data like this without probability, including the probability that your data is crap. Bias in scientific research is real.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Self-identified doh-head here and happy to learn so, please let me know: Scott is being rational, Joe is being logical.
@normonics do I have that right? I've not studied logic but apply my lay efforts the best I can then rationally explain. All of us rationalize our opinions, no? -
My attempt at improving the quality of my data is temporarily bounded by this tweet thread.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
'Skeptics' are a mass of inconsistencies. They: --insist there's no GHE/warming to worry abt, but that we need the pedal to the metal now to save us from imminent ice age. --hate land data adjustments, but love the torturing of satellite temps. --insist on cooling, but ignore OHCpic.twitter.com/EpZGJN9ovb
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It’s a shame this resulted in blockade fallout. It’s pretty simple: “change” is objective and “improve” is subjective. To avoid opinionated arguing, principled scientists agree not to change data outside of the experiment window. The intent of changes doesn’t matter b/c bias.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.