The counter argument would be "that provides no real explanation of what's causing it" I believe in climate change....but that's the response and its a reasonable one I think
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's too short-scale. 100 years is a blink. Look longer, did CO2 correlate? Is correlation causation?
-
Science says C02 did correlate in the past when all variables are considered. Skeptics leave out variables.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Yes. he's saying that statistical inference is not "physics". as such, it still does not answer the basic question: "in a field with uncertainties, do I trust the politicians not to pick the solutions that push in the social direction they prefer, even if other are available?"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
The poison is its not a climate argument. Its a localized temperature argument (on Earth). It could mean something, or its could mean nothing. But its not apples to apples. 1 example...a temp in NYC in 1900 vs now & the amount of blacktop there is thousands of time higher now....
-
Not to mention the growth in population.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If one person says a matter is completely settled and is no longer up for debate, and a second person uses Twitter to show no one can conclusively prove the matter one way or the other, is the second person proving the first one wrong about the debate?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I’m asking for a rhetorical friend.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.