If human caused climate change is a hoax, wouldn't gas turbines be safer than G4 nuclear?
-
-
-
You can't burn 95% of today's nuke waste with gas turbines. Gen IV can, and the 5% residue is 99.9% inert in 300 year. Gen IV is a win-win for both sides of the climate debate.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@DeanPetrulakis, If you want to talk more about the
#GreenNuclearDeal feel free to DM me.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
From the prior discussion, the decay time is down to hundreds of years versus the thousands of years. Further, new reactors burn 'spent' fuel, so the amount waste is less. Here is a site I found with some FAQs: https://www.gen-4.org/gif/jcms/c_40275/gen-iv-reactor-design …
End of conversation
-
-
-
Not only is fail-to-safe nuclear the way forward, it actually is the government's job to approve the designs.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Dude hail yeah!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thorium would be better, just need focused science and engineering effort to deal with materials of construction challenge.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Although Gen IV isn't quite rolled out yet, there's no reason not to use an established heavy water design. The chain reaction takes place in the heavy water, so if it overheats, the water steams away & the reaction stops. Inherantly safe. Use many small ones, not a central one.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Or just wait until ITER is up and running.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.