@ScottAdamsSays
But RPOS isn't even directionally accurate. Doesn't that make her explanation vastly less persuasive? Her $500m addendum shows that she's defending the thrust of it - that NY was losing thru a big payout.
Can you point to a remotely similar error by Trump?
-
-
That's a great argument for voting tests. "She thought we were paying a $3 billion bribe to Amazon, but we were letting them keep 10% of the cash they were going to give NY." If she remains prominent this will come to haunt her. There aren't enough total morons for her purposes
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.